Esc
Navigation
Actions
๐ŸŽจ Cycle Theme t
๐Ÿ”„ Toggle Blog/Dev Mode
โฌ†๏ธ Scroll to Top gg
โฌ‡๏ธ Scroll to Bottom G
BIOS v2.1.0
Loading kernel...
Starting services...
Welcome to dev@sandikodev
NORMAL
dev@enigma
โšก 12% โ”‚ ๐Ÿ’พ 4.2G โ”‚ ๐Ÿ“ถ eth0 โ”‚ ๐Ÿ• 00:00 โ”‚ ๐Ÿ“… Mon 01
โ–ฃ nvim โ€” sed-vs-fs-write-token-cost.md
dev@enigma:~ โฏ cat sed-vs-fs-write-token-cost.md

SED vs fs_write: Token Cost Analysis

SED vs fs_write: Token Cost Analysis

When working with text manipulation in development workflows, choosing the right tool can impact both efficiency and cost, especially when using AI-assisted development tools.

The Comparison

SED Command

  • Token Cost: ~50 tokens per operation
  • Learning Curve: Steep regex syntax
  • Flexibility: High for pattern matching
  • Cross-platform: Limited on Windows

fs_write Tool

  • Token Cost: ~120 tokens per operation
  • Learning Curve: Intuitive API
  • Flexibility: Structured operations
  • Cross-platform: Universal support

Use Cases

Choose SED when:

  • Simple pattern replacements
  • Unix/Linux environments
  • Batch text processing
  • Minimal token usage priority

Choose fs_write when:

  • Complex file operations
  • Cross-platform compatibility
  • Structured content management
  • AI-assisted development

Conclusion

While SED offers lower token costs, fs_write provides better developer experience and reliability across platforms. The choice depends on your specific workflow and environment constraints.

dev@enigma:~ โฏ
โ–ฃ navigation
โ–ฃ info
type: post
mode: dev ๐Ÿ’ป