⌨️ Keyboard Shortcuts

Navigation

g + h Go to Home
g + b Go to Blog
g + a Go to About

Actions

/ Search
? Show shortcuts
Esc Close overlay

Scrolling

j Scroll down
k Scroll up
g + g Scroll to top
G Scroll to bottom
Esc
Quick Actions
🏠 Go to Home g h
📝 Go to Blog g b
What I'm doing now
👤 About Me g a
Terminal Commands
$ ls posts List all blog posts
$ ls tags List all tags
$ cat about.md Read about page
$ cd ~ Go to home
SED vs fs_write: Token Cost Analysis
0% 3 min left

SED vs fs_write: Token Cost Analysis

SED vs fs_write: Token Cost Analysis

SED vs fs_write: Token Cost Analysis

When working with text manipulation in development workflows, choosing the right tool can impact both efficiency and cost, especially when using AI-assisted development tools.

The Comparison

SED Command

  • Token Cost: ~50 tokens per operation
  • Learning Curve: Steep regex syntax
  • Flexibility: High for pattern matching
  • Cross-platform: Limited on Windows

fs_write Tool

  • Token Cost: ~120 tokens per operation
  • Learning Curve: Intuitive API
  • Flexibility: Structured operations
  • Cross-platform: Universal support

Use Cases

Choose SED when:

  • Simple pattern replacements
  • Unix/Linux environments
  • Batch text processing
  • Minimal token usage priority

Choose fs_write when:

  • Complex file operations
  • Cross-platform compatibility
  • Structured content management
  • AI-assisted development

Conclusion

While SED offers lower token costs, fs_write provides better developer experience and reliability across platforms. The choice depends on your specific workflow and environment constraints.

Comments